Sharkbench

Benchmarking programming languages and web frameworks

Vert.x: Semeru vs Temurin

Vert.x is a toolkit for building reactive applications on the JVM designed to be lightweight, high-performance, and modular. It enables developers to create microservices and distributed systems with ease through an event-driven, non-blocking development model. Vert.x supports multiple programming languages and emphasizes performance and scalability.
This benchmark tests how fast a framework can perform concurrent HTTP requests, I/O operations, and JSON de/serialization.

OS: LinuxCPU: Intel Core Ultra 5 325Last Updated: 2026-10-14

Comparison

Temurin processes 1.68x requests per second compared to Semeru, a 68.02% improvement.
MedianP99
Mode
Requests per second
Latency
Stability
Memory
Build Time
34697 (+68.02 %)
0.9 ms (-39.77 %)
43.00 % (-8.45 %)
323.2 MB (+43.90 %)
17.71 s (-16.54 %)
20650
1.4 ms
51.45 %
224.6 MB
21.22 s

All results

MedianP99
Framework
Requests per second
Latency
Stability
Memory
Build Time
34697
0.9 ms
43.00 %
323.2 MB
17.71 s
34519
0.9 ms
42.36 %
334.5 MB
18.49 s
32443
0.9 ms
41.17 %
326.9 MB
18.32 s
31690
0.9 ms
39.41 %
322.1 MB
26.14 s
20650
1.4 ms
51.45 %
224.6 MB
21.22 s
20979
1.4 ms
50.66 %
225.3 MB
20.19 s
21480
1.4 ms
50.76 %
230.2 MB
19.78 s
20831
1.4 ms
50.07 %
208.7 MB
20.82 s

Popular web frameworks

How does Vert.x compare to other popular frameworks?
MedianP99
Framework
Requests per second
Latency
Stability
Memory
Build Time
34697
0.9 ms
43.00 %
323.2 MB
17.71 s
26670
1.2 ms
74.13 %
16.5 MB
26.69 s
20650
1.4 ms
51.45 %
224.6 MB
21.22 s
17041
1.5 ms
23.04 %
101.8 MB
6.09 s
15270
2.0 ms
29.45 %
228.4 MB
4.92 s
2962
1.6 ms
1.86 %
286.4 MB
37.73 s
1640
3.4 ms
3.65 %
23.1 MB
32.20 s
792
32.9 ms
20.81 %
63.3 MB
8.55 s
320
99.9 ms
56.36 %
110.2 MB
8.94 s
279
103.8 ms
57.16 %
151.9 MB
10.29 s
92
319.0 ms
80.90 %
80.4 MB
95.22 s

© 2026 Tien Nam Do